Corki

Figures on this page are from League of Legends patch 16.18.1.
The win, pick, and ban rate figures here are a third-party League of Legends statistics provider's aggregation of match data that originates with Riot Games — Riot doesn't itself publish win-rate statistics. See how it works for the method, including the per-tier noise-width (σ) calibration Should I Dodge publishes on top of that raw data — how far a rate actually sits from meaningless, not something the provider itself measures.
| Role | Win Rate | Pick Rate |
|---|---|---|
| ADC | 48.1% | 1.1% |
About 0.3% of games at this tier see Corki banned before anyone even picks a role — one number for the whole champion, not something that genuinely differs lane to lane. It's shown here alongside Corki's ADC numbers, the highest-pick-rate role, purely because that's the row this page leads with. Why isn't this broken down by role?
Corki's ADC win rate is 1.9 percentage points below an even 50% — Should I Dodge's win-probability model varies by about 4.8 percentage points of standard deviation from lobby to lobby across all ranks, purely from which champions get drawn, so this gap is smaller than that noise, not solid evidence the champion is unusually strong or weak right now.
Corki is tracked in exactly one role at this tier scope, ADC — so there's no ambiguity below about which lane the rest of this page's per-tier, threat, and counters reporting describes.
Corki's ADC Win Rate By Tier
| Tier | Win Rate | Pick Rate | Edge (noise-widths) | Clears 0.5σ? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronze | 47.2% | 0.6% | 0.45σ | No |
| Silver | 48.7% | 0.8% | 0.23σ | No |
| Gold | 48.6% | 0.9% | 0.25σ | No |
| Platinum | 48.6% | 1.2% | 0.28σ | No |
| Emerald | 46.8% | 1.4% | 0.70σ | Yes |
| Diamond | 48.5% | 1.7% | 0.34σ | No |
| Master | 48.6% | 2.4% | 0.30σ | No |
| Grandmaster | 49.7% | 3.3% | 0.04σ | No |
| Challenger | 48.0% | 3.1% | 0.17σ | No |
Corki's ADC win rate ranges from 46.8% at Emerald to 49.7% at Grandmaster across the 9 of 10 ranked tiers with published data for this role — a 2.9-point spread. Measured against each tier's own noise floor, that's 0.04σ at Grandmaster and 0.70σ at Emerald, with only the Emerald figure clearing the 0.5σ bar Should I Dodge itself requires before calling a reading anything but Neutral. See how noise-widths are calculated and what they mean for each rank.
Should I Dodge's curated read has Corki's power curve as no strong lean either way — a community-consensus judgment about where the champion's power peaks, not measured win-rate-by-duration data (the stats source doesn't publish that).
Should I Dodge's curated read flags Corki's kit as carrying poke — a community-consensus judgment about what the kit threatens, not measured win-rate data, and the same read behind the counter-build suggestions on the analyzer.
Should I Dodge maintains Corki's scaling lean and kit-threat reads above by hand, one champion at a time, across the whole roster — not generated from the win-rate numbers on this page, and not refreshed automatically when those numbers move.
Who Counters Corki?
Matchups below are for Corki's ADC role -- its highest-pick-rate lane, played in 1.1% of its recorded games at this tier.
Champions That Counter Corki
| Champion | Win Rate vs Corki | Edge (noise-widths) |
|---|---|---|
| 56.6% | 1.38σ | |
| 56.6% | 1.38σ | |
| 56.3% | 1.31σ | |
| 56.3% | 1.31σ | |
| 55.9% | 1.24σ |
Champions Corki Counters
| Champion | Win Rate vs Corki | Edge (noise-widths) |
|---|---|---|
| 45.7% | 0.89σ | |
| 47.7% | 0.48σ | |
| 48.1% | 0.39σ | |
| 48.4% | 0.33σ | |
| 48.4% | 0.33σ |
The stats source lists at most five champions in each direction for Corki: the 5 that counter it here lean control-heavy, with a tight, 1-point spread — none of them stand out much from the others among them, while 5 favourable matchups round out the picture — most matchups you could actually face simply aren't covered.
Want a live read for your own lobby? Try the analyzer.
Learn more: what a champion win rate actually means and why the same win rate means different things at different tiers.